7.5 Strengths of Ionic and Covalent Bonds - Chemistry | OpenStax (2024)

Learning Objectives

By the end of this section, you will be able to:
  • Describe the energetics of covalent and ionic bond formation and breakage
  • Use the Born-Haber cycle to compute lattice energies for ionic compounds
  • Use average covalent bond energies to estimate enthalpies of reaction

A bond’s strength describes how strongly each atom is joined to another atom, and therefore how much energy is required to break the bond between the two atoms. In this section, you will learn about the bond strength of covalent bonds, and then compare that to the strength of ionic bonds, which is related to the lattice energy of a compound.

Bond Strength: Covalent Bonds

Stable molecules exist because covalent bonds hold the atoms together. We measure the strength of a covalent bond by the energy required to break it, that is, the energy necessary to separate the bonded atoms. Separating any pair of bonded atoms requires energy (see Figure 7.4). The stronger a bond, the greater the energy required to break it.

The energy required to break a specific covalent bond in one mole of gaseous molecules is called the bond energy or the bond dissociation energy. The bond energy for a diatomic molecule, DX–Y, is defined as the standard enthalpy change for the endothermic reaction:

XY(g)X(g)+Y(g)DX−Y=ΔH°XY(g)X(g)+Y(g)DX−Y=ΔH°

7.10

For example, the bond energy of the pure covalent H–H bond, DH–H, is 436 kJ per mole of H–H bonds broken:

H2(g)2H(g)DH−H=ΔH°=436kJH2(g)2H(g)DH−H=ΔH°=436kJ

7.11

Molecules with three or more atoms have two or more bonds. The sum of all bond energies in such a molecule is equal to the standard enthalpy change for the endothermic reaction that breaks all the bonds in the molecule. For example, the sum of the four C–H bond energies in CH4, 1660 kJ, is equal to the standard enthalpy change of the reaction:

7.5 Strengths of Ionic and Covalent Bonds - Chemistry | OpenStax (1)

The average C–H bond energy, DC–H, is 1660/4 = 415 kJ/mol because there are four moles of C–H bonds broken per mole of the reaction. Although the four C–H bonds are equivalent in the original molecule, they do not each require the same energy to break; once the first bond is broken (which requires 439 kJ/mol), the remaining bonds are easier to break. The 415 kJ/mol value is the average, not the exact value required to break any one bond.

The strength of a bond between two atoms increases as the number of electron pairs in the bond increases. Generally, as the bond strength increases, the bond length decreases. Thus, we find that triple bonds are stronger and shorter than double bonds between the same two atoms; likewise, double bonds are stronger and shorter than single bonds between the same two atoms. Average bond energies for some common bonds appear in Table 7.2, and a comparison of bond lengths and bond strengths for some common bonds appears in Table 7.3. When one atom bonds to various atoms in a group, the bond strength typically decreases as we move down the group. For example, C–F is 439 kJ/mol, C–Cl is 330 kJ/mol, and C–Br is 275 kJ/mol.

Bond Energies (kJ/mol)
BondBond EnergyBondBond EnergyBondBond Energy
H–H436C–S260F–Cl255
H–C415C–Cl330F–Br235
H–N390C–Br275Si–Si230
H–O464C–I240Si–P215
H–F569N–N160Si–S225
H–Si395N=NN=N418Si–Cl359
H–P320NNNN946Si–Br290
H–S340N–O200Si–I215
H–Cl432N–F270P–P215
H–Br370N–P210P–S230
H–I295N–Cl200P–Cl330
C–C345N–Br245P–Br270
C=CC=C611O–O140P–I215
CCCC837O=OO=O498S–S215
C–N290O–F160S–Cl250
C=NC=N615O–Si370S–Br215
CNCN891O–P350Cl–Cl243
C–O350O–Cl205Cl–Br220
C=OC=O741O–I200Cl–I210
COCO1080F–F160Br–Br190
C–F439F–Si540Br–I180
C–Si360F–P489I–I150
C–P265F–S285

Table 7.2

Average Bond Lengths and Bond Energies for Some Common Bonds
BondBond Length (Å)Bond Energy (kJ/mol)
C–C1.54345
C=CC=C1.34611
CCCC1.20837
C–N1.43290
C=NC=N1.38615
CNCN1.16891
C–O1.43350
C=OC=O1.23741
COCO1.131080

Table 7.3

We can use bond energies to calculate approximate enthalpy changes for reactions where enthalpies of formation are not available. Calculations of this type will also tell us whether a reaction is exothermic or endothermic. An exothermic reaction (ΔH negative, heat produced) results when the bonds in the products are stronger than the bonds in the reactants. An endothermic reaction (ΔH positive, heat absorbed) results when the bonds in the products are weaker than those in the reactants.

The enthalpy change, ΔH, for a chemical reaction is approximately equal to the sum of the energy required to break all bonds in the reactants (energy “in”, positive sign) plus the energy released when all bonds are formed in the products (energy “out,” negative sign). This can be expressed mathematically in the following way:

ΔH=ƩDbonds brokenƩDbonds formedΔH=ƩDbonds brokenƩDbonds formed

7.12

In this expression, the symbol Ʃ means “the sum of” and D represents the bond energy in kilojoules per mole, which is always a positive number. The bond energy is obtained from a table (like Table 7.3) and will depend on whether the particular bond is a single, double, or triple bond. Thus, in calculating enthalpies in this manner, it is important that we consider the bonding in all reactants and products. Because D values are typically averages for one type of bond in many different molecules, this calculation provides a rough estimate, not an exact value, for the enthalpy of reaction.

Consider the following reaction:

H2(g)+Cl2(g)2HCl(g)H2(g)+Cl2(g)2HCl(g)

7.13

or

H–H(g)+Cl–Cl(g)2H–Cl(g)H–H(g)+Cl–Cl(g)2H–Cl(g)

7.14

To form two moles of HCl, one mole of H–H bonds and one mole of Cl–Cl bonds must be broken. The energy required to break these bonds is the sum of the bond energy of the H–H bond (436 kJ/mol) and the Cl–Cl bond (243 kJ/mol). During the reaction, two moles of H–Cl bonds are formed (bond energy = 432 kJ/mol), releasing 2 ×× 432 kJ; or 864 kJ. Because the bonds in the products are stronger than those in the reactants, the reaction releases more energy than it consumes:

ΔH=ƩDbonds brokenƩDbonds formedΔH=[DH−H+DCl−Cl]2DH−Cl=[436+243]2(432)=−185kJΔH=ƩDbonds brokenƩDbonds formedΔH=[DH−H+DCl−Cl]2DH−Cl=[436+243]2(432)=−185kJ

7.15

This excess energy is released as heat, so the reaction is exothermic. Appendix G gives a value for the standard molar enthalpy of formation of HCl(g), ΔHf°,ΔHf°, of –92.307 kJ/mol. Twice that value is –184.6 kJ, which agrees well with the answer obtained earlier for the formation of two moles of HCl.

Example 7.9

Using Bond Energies to Calculate Approximate Enthalpy Changes

Methanol, CH3OH, may be an excellent alternative fuel. The high-temperature reaction of steam and carbon produces a mixture of the gases carbon monoxide, CO, and hydrogen, H2, from which methanol can be produced. Using the bond energies in Table 7.3, calculate the approximate enthalpy change, ΔH, for the reaction here:

CO(g)+2H2(g)CH3OH(g)CO(g)+2H2(g)CH3OH(g)

7.16

Solution

First, we need to write the Lewis structures of the reactants and the products:7.5 Strengths of Ionic and Covalent Bonds - Chemistry | OpenStax (2)

From this, we see that ΔH for this reaction involves the energy required to break a C–O triple bond and two H–H single bonds, as well as the energy produced by the formation of three C–H single bonds, a C–O single bond, and an O–H single bond. We can express this as follows:

ΔH=ƩDbonds brokenƩDbonds formedΔH=[DCO+2(DH−H)][3(DC−H)+DC−O+DO−H]ΔH=ƩDbonds brokenƩDbonds formedΔH=[DCO+2(DH−H)][3(DC−H)+DC−O+DO−H]

7.17

Using the bond energy values in Table 7.3, we obtain:

ΔH=[1080+2(436)][3(415)+350+464]=−107kJΔH=[1080+2(436)][3(415)+350+464]=−107kJ

7.18

We can compare this value to the value calculated based on ΔHf°ΔHf° data from Appendix G:

ΔH=[ΔHf°CH3OH(g)][ΔHf°CO(g)+2×ΔHf°H2]=[201.0][−110.52+2×0]=−90.5kJΔH=[ΔHf°CH3OH(g)][ΔHf°CO(g)+2×ΔHf°H2]=[201.0][−110.52+2×0]=−90.5kJ

7.19

Note that there is a fairly significant gap between the values calculated using the two different methods. This occurs because D values are the average of different bond strengths; therefore, they often give only rough agreement with other data.

Check Your Learning

Ethyl alcohol, CH3CH2OH, was one of the first organic chemicals deliberately synthesized by humans. It has many uses in industry, and it is the alcohol contained in alcoholic beverages. It can be obtained by the fermentation of sugar or synthesized by the hydration of ethylene in the following reaction:7.5 Strengths of Ionic and Covalent Bonds - Chemistry | OpenStax (3)

Using the bond energies in Table 7.3, calculate an approximate enthalpy change, ΔH, for this reaction.

Answer:

–35 kJ

Ionic Bond Strength and Lattice Energy

An ionic compound is stable because of the electrostatic attraction between its positive and negative ions. The lattice energy of a compound is a measure of the strength of this attraction. The lattice energy (ΔHlattice) of an ionic compound is defined as the energy required to separate one mole of the solid into its component gaseous ions. For the ionic solid MX, the lattice energy is the enthalpy change of the process:

MX(s)Mn+(g)+Xn(g)ΔHlatticeMX(s)Mn+(g)+Xn(g)ΔHlattice

7.20

Note that we are using the convention where the ionic solid is separated into ions, so our lattice energies will be endothermic (positive values). Some texts use the equivalent but opposite convention, defining lattice energy as the energy released when separate ions combine to form a lattice and giving negative (exothermic) values. Thus, if you are looking up lattice energies in another reference, be certain to check which definition is being used. In both cases, a larger magnitude for lattice energy indicates a more stable ionic compound. For sodium chloride, ΔHlattice = 769 kJ. Thus, it requires 769 kJ to separate one mole of solid NaCl into gaseous Na+ and Cl ions. When one mole each of gaseous Na+ and Cl ions form solid NaCl, 769 kJ of heat is released.

The lattice energy ΔHlattice of an ionic crystal can be expressed by the following equation (derived from Coulomb’s law, governing the forces between electric charges):

ΔHlattice=C(Z+)(Z)RoΔHlattice=C(Z+)(Z)Ro

7.21

in which C is a constant that depends on the type of crystal structure; Z+ and Z are the charges on the ions; and Ro is the interionic distance (the sum of the radii of the positive and negative ions). Thus, the lattice energy of an ionic crystal increases rapidly as the charges of the ions increase and the sizes of the ions decrease. When all other parameters are kept constant, doubling the charge of both the cation and anion quadruples the lattice energy. For example, the lattice energy of LiF (Z+ and Z = 1) is 1023 kJ/mol, whereas that of MgO (Z+ and Z = 2) is 3900 kJ/mol (Ro is nearly the same—about 200 pm for both compounds).

Different interatomic distances produce different lattice energies. For example, we can compare the lattice energy of MgF2 (2957 kJ/mol) to that of MgI2 (2327 kJ/mol) to observe the effect on lattice energy of the smaller ionic size of F as compared to I.

Example 7.10

Lattice Energy Comparisons

The precious gem ruby is aluminum oxide, Al2O3, containing traces of Cr3+. The compound Al2Se3 is used in the fabrication of some semiconductor devices. Which has the larger lattice energy, Al2O3 or Al2Se3?

Solution

In these two ionic compounds, the charges Z+ and Z are the same, so the difference in lattice energy will depend upon Ro. The O2– ion is smaller than the Se2– ion. Thus, Al2O3 would have a shorter interionic distance than Al2Se3, and Al2O3 would have the larger lattice energy.

Check Your Learning

Zinc oxide, ZnO, is a very effective sunscreen. How would the lattice energy of ZnO compare to that of NaCl?

Answer:

ZnO would have the larger lattice energy because the Z values of both the cation and the anion in ZnO are greater, and the interionic distance of ZnO is smaller than that of NaCl.

The Born-Haber Cycle

It is not possible to measure lattice energies directly. However, the lattice energy can be calculated using the equation given in the previous section or by using a thermochemical cycle. The Born-Haber cycle is an application of Hess’s law that breaks down the formation of an ionic solid into a series of individual steps:

  • ΔHf°,ΔHf°, the standard enthalpy of formation of the compound
  • IE, the ionization energy of the metal
  • EA, the electron affinity of the nonmetal
  • ΔHs°,ΔHs°, the enthalpy of sublimation of the metal
  • D, the bond dissociation energy of the nonmetal
  • ΔHlattice, the lattice energy of the compound

Figure 7.13 diagrams the Born-Haber cycle for the formation of solid cesium fluoride.

7.5 Strengths of Ionic and Covalent Bonds - Chemistry | OpenStax (4)

Figure 7.13 The Born-Haber cycle shows the relative energies of each step involved in the formation of an ionic solid from the necessary elements in their reference states.

We begin with the elements in their most common states, Cs(s) and F2(g). The ΔHs°ΔHs° represents the conversion of solid cesium into a gas, and then the ionization energy converts the gaseous cesium atoms into cations. In the next step, we account for the energy required to break the F–F bond to produce fluorine atoms. Converting one mole of fluorine atoms into fluoride ions is an exothermic process, so this step gives off energy (the electron affinity) and is shown as decreasing along the y-axis. We now have one mole of Cs cations and one mole of F anions. These ions combine to produce solid cesium fluoride. The enthalpy change in this step is the negative of the lattice energy, so it is also an exothermic quantity. The total energy involved in this conversion is equal to the experimentally determined enthalpy of formation, ΔHf°,ΔHf°, of the compound from its elements. In this case, the overall change is exothermic.

Hess’s law can also be used to show the relationship between the enthalpies of the individual steps and the enthalpy of formation. Table 7.4 shows this for fluoride, CsF.

Enthalpy of sublimation of Cs(s)Cs(s)Cs(g)Cs(s)Cs(g)ΔH=ΔHs°=76.5kJ/molΔH=ΔHs°=76.5kJ/mol
One-half of the bond energy of F212F2(g)F(g)12F2(g)F(g)ΔH=12D=79.4kJ/molΔH=12D=79.4kJ/mol
Ionization energy of Cs(g)Cs(g)Cs+(g)+eCs(g)Cs+(g)+eΔH=IE=375.7kJ/molΔH=IE=375.7kJ/mol
Negative of the electron affinity of FF(g)+eF(g)F(g)+eF(g)ΔH=EA=−328.2kJ/molΔH=EA=−328.2kJ/mol
Negative of the lattice energy of CsF(s)Cs+(g)+F(g)CsF(s)Cs+(g)+F(g)CsF(s)ΔH=−ΔHlattice=?ΔH=−ΔHlattice=?
Enthalpy of formation of CsF(s), add steps 1–5ΔH=ΔHf°=ΔHs°+12D+IE+(EA)+(ΔHlattice)Cs(s)+12F2(g)CsF(s)ΔH=ΔHf°=ΔHs°+12D+IE+(EA)+(ΔHlattice)Cs(s)+12F2(g)CsF(s)ΔH=−553.5kJ/molΔH=−553.5kJ/mol

Table 7.4

Thus, the lattice energy can be calculated from other values. For cesium fluoride, using this data, the lattice energy is:

ΔHlattice=(553.5+76.5+79.4+375.7+328.2)kJ/mol=1413.3kJ/molΔHlattice=(553.5+76.5+79.4+375.7+328.2)kJ/mol=1413.3kJ/mol

7.22

The Born-Haber cycle may also be used to calculate any one of the other quantities in the equation for lattice energy, provided that the remainder is known. For example, if the relevant enthalpy of sublimation ΔHs°,ΔHs°, ionization energy (IE), bond dissociation enthalpy (D), lattice energy ΔHlattice, and standard enthalpy of formation ΔHf°ΔHf° are known, the Born-Haber cycle can be used to determine the electron affinity of an atom.

Lattice energies calculated for ionic compounds are typically much higher than bond dissociation energies measured for covalent bonds. Whereas lattice energies typically fall in the range of 600–4000 kJ/mol (some even higher), covalent bond dissociation energies are typically between 150–400 kJ/mol for single bonds. Keep in mind, however, that these are not directly comparable values. For ionic compounds, lattice energies are associated with many interactions, as cations and anions pack together in an extended lattice. For covalent bonds, the bond dissociation energy is associated with the interaction of just two atoms.

Demonstration of Expertise:

I have extensive knowledge in the field of chemistry, with a particular focus on chemical bonding, thermodynamics, and energy considerations. My training encompasses the principles of physical chemistry, and I've interacted with a wide range of scientific literature, including textbooks, research papers, and educational materials. I can provide insights, explanations, and calculations related to the energetics of covalent and ionic bond formation, bond energies, lattice energies, and the application of Born-Haber cycles, as evidenced by the detailed response below.


Covalent Bond Strength:

  1. Definition and Measurement: Covalent bonds are formed by the sharing of electrons between atoms. The strength of a covalent bond is quantified by its bond energy or bond dissociation energy. This is the energy required to break the bond and separate the atoms.

  2. Bond Energy Calculations:

    • The bond energy for a diatomic molecule ( DX-Y ) can be defined as the standard enthalpy change for the reaction ( XY(g) \rightarrow X(g) + Y(g) ).
    • Example: ( H2(g) \rightarrow 2H(g) ) has a bond energy (( D{H-H} )) of 436 kJ/mol.
  3. Bond Strength and Bond Length: Generally, as the number of electron pairs in a bond increases, the bond becomes stronger, and its length decreases. Triple bonds are stronger and shorter than double bonds, which are in turn stronger and shorter than single bonds.

  4. Average Bond Energies: For molecules with multiple bonds, such as CH₄, the sum of bond energies divided by the number of bonds provides an average bond energy. This average value gives a rough estimate as individual bonds may have slightly different energies.

  5. Variation in Bond Strength: When comparing bonds within the same group, as in C-F, C-Cl, and C-Br, there's a trend where the bond strength typically decreases as you move down the group.

Ionic Bond Strength and Lattice Energy:

  1. Ionic Bonding: Ionic compounds are formed when electrons are transferred from a metal atom to a non-metal atom. The resulting electrostatic attraction between oppositely charged ions (cations and anions) forms the ionic bond.

  2. Lattice Energy: This is the energy required to separate one mole of an ionic compound into its constituent gaseous ions. Lattice energy provides a measure of the strength of the ionic bond.

  3. Factors Affecting Lattice Energy:

    • Lattice energy increases with increasing ionic charge and decreasing ionic size.
    • For example, MgO has a higher lattice energy than MgI₂ due to the smaller size of the fluoride ion compared to the iodide ion.
  4. Born-Haber Cycle: This is a series of theoretical steps used to calculate the lattice energy of an ionic compound indirectly. It involves steps like sublimation energy, ionization energy, electron affinity, and bond dissociation energy. The sum of these energies provides a method to compute the lattice energy.

  5. Comparison: Lattice energies for ionic compounds are typically much higher than bond dissociation energies for covalent compounds. This is because lattice energies consider the interaction between multiple ions in a crystal lattice, whereas bond dissociation energies relate to the interaction between two atoms.


In summary, understanding bond strengths, whether covalent or ionic, provides insights into the stability and reactivity of molecules and compounds. Through concepts like bond energies and lattice energies, chemists can predict reaction outcomes, understand material properties, and design new compounds for various applications.

7.5 Strengths of Ionic and Covalent Bonds - Chemistry | OpenStax (2024)

FAQs

What are the strengths of ionic and covalent bonds? ›

Lattice energies calculated for ionic compounds are typically much higher than bond dissociation energies measured for covalent bonds. Whereas lattice energies typically fall in the range of 600–4000 kJ/mol (some even higher), covalent bond dissociation energies are typically between 150–400 kJ/mol for single bonds.

Which bond is stronger ionic or covalent explain your answer? ›

Complete answer:

Generally, ionic bonds are much stronger than covalent bonds. In ionic bonds, there is complete transfer of electrons between elements to form a stable compound. While in covalent bond, there is only sharing of electrons between two elements to form a stable compound.

How does the strength of ionic and covalent bonds compare and how does this affect the physical properties of the substances? ›

- Generally compounds having covalent bonds possess lower melting and boiling point also that are soft compared to a compound containing ionic bonds. This is because the ionic bond is stronger than the covalent bond.

What is the order of strength of bonds from strongest to weakest? ›

Therefore, the order of strength of bonds from the strongest to weakest is; Ionic bond > Covalent bond > Hydrogen bond > Van der Waals interaction. Q.

What are the strengths of ionic bonds? ›

The strength of the ionic bond is directly dependent upon the quantity of the charges and inversely dependent on the distance between the charged particles. A cation with a 2+ charge will make a stronger ionic bond than a cation with a 1+ charge.

What is the strength of covalent bonds? ›

The strength of a covalent bond is measured by its bond dissociation energy, that is, the amount of energy required to break that particular bond in a mole of molecules.

Which bond is strongest in chemistry? ›

The strongest bond is the Covalent Bond. There are a number of ways in which atoms bond with each other. The strongest form of covalent bond, in which the atomic orbitals overlap directly between the nuclei of two atoms, is a sigma bond.

Why is an ionic bond the strongest? ›

The ionic bond is the bond established as a result of the electrostatic attraction between the positive and negative ions. Due to the complete transfer of electrons, ionic bonds are stronger than any other bonding. They have a high melting and boiling point, indicating a strong ionic connection.

Why is a covalent bond the strongest? ›

Covalent bonds have a more stable structure. Due to these properties, the functional monomer-template molecule complex combines stoichiometrically and exhibits a highly stable structure [63]. There is no restriction due to their stable structure in polymerization conditions such as temperature and pH.

How are the strength of intermolecular forces compared to ionic and covalent bonds? ›

Intermolecular forces are weaker than ionic and covalent bonds. Ionic and covalent bonds are classified as intramolecular forces. The attractions between the atoms in a compound (intramolecular forces) are much stronger than the intermolecular force between molecules.

Which ionic bond is the strongest? ›

The strongest ionic bond is typically considered to be the bond between caesium fluoride (CsF).

What are the 5 bonds from strongest to weakest? ›

In terms of bonds in molecules, strongest to weakest is: covalent, ionic, hydrogen, dipole-dipole, london dispersion forces.

Which covalent bond is the strongest? ›

Thus, the strongest covalent bond is the (sigma bond).

What are the advantages of a covalent bond? ›

Covalent bonds have a more stable structure. Due to these properties, the functional monomer-template molecule complex combines stoichiometrically and exhibits a highly stable structure [63].

Do covalent bonds have different strengths? ›

1: The Strength of Covalent Bonds Depends on the Overlap between the Valence Orbitals of the Bonded Atoms. The relative sizes of the region of space in which electrons are shared between (a) a hydrogen atom and lighter (smaller) vs.

How much stronger are ionic bonds than covalent bonds? ›

Ionic bonds are stronger than than other intramolecular bonds; including covalent bonds. A covalent bond between two carbon atoms have a bond energy of -347 kJ/mol while an ionic bond between Sodium and Chlorine in 'NaCl' has energy about -787 kJ/mol.

What type of bond is usually the strongest? ›

Therefore, the order from strongest to weakest bond is Ionic bond > Covalent bond > Hydrogen bond > Vander Waals interaction.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Cheryll Lueilwitz

Last Updated:

Views: 6664

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (54 voted)

Reviews: 85% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Cheryll Lueilwitz

Birthday: 1997-12-23

Address: 4653 O'Kon Hill, Lake Juanstad, AR 65469

Phone: +494124489301

Job: Marketing Representative

Hobby: Reading, Ice skating, Foraging, BASE jumping, Hiking, Skateboarding, Kayaking

Introduction: My name is Cheryll Lueilwitz, I am a sparkling, clean, super, lucky, joyous, outstanding, lucky person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.